<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
         xmlns:err="http://jelix.org/ns/xmlerror/1.0">
 <channel>

    <title><![CDATA[Commentaires de l'article: Canyon F10 2008]]></title>
    <link>http://www.rouesartisanales.com/article-12145450-6.html#anchorComment</link>
    <description>Les 25 derniers commentaires publiés sur l'article &quot;Canyon F10 2008&quot; du blog &quot;Roues Artisanales - Bike tech magasine - handbuilt wheels boutique&quot;</description>

        <language>fr</language>
    
    
    <pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 03:17:48 +0200</pubDate>    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 03:17:48 +0200</lastBuildDate>    <generator>Over-blog.com RSS 2.0 Engine</generator>    <copyright>Copyright 2010 www.rouesartisanales.com</copyright>            <category>Salons</category>    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification/</docs>                        
      <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Commentaire de Apostolis Koumoulis]]></title>
        <link>http://www.rouesartisanales.com/article-12145450-6.html#comment20566668</link>        <description><![CDATA[Hello,<br />Very nice presentation. I've been looking at carbon frames and the canyon F10 seemed to be a very good proposition, stifness and price wise. (I am 190cm and 93kg, I need a stiff frame and I am not willing to pay crazy money for a Colnago extreme power).<br /><br />The only bad thing about it was the uneven transition from the head tube to the fork.<br /><br />Canyon fixed that with the new version of the frame, but look what they've done to the rear triangle. Thin seat stays, 27,2 seat post, massively agly seat tube. I'll have to wait for the reports to see how all this translates in practice.<br /><br />Have they (Canyon ) said anything about alterations to the Geometry?<br /><br />I also noticed that the picture they have on their site is a litle different at the chain stays and at the fork. <br /><br />Thanks for your efforts]]></description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 20:37:04 +0200</pubDate>        <guid >http://www.rouesartisanales.com/article-12145450-6.html#comment20566668</guid>
                                            </item>
      <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Commentaire de Felix]]></title>
        <link>http://www.rouesartisanales.com/article-12145450-6.html#comment20483979</link>        <description><![CDATA[Thanks for your help Adrien! Really appreciated]]></description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 14:45:32 +0200</pubDate>        <guid >http://www.rouesartisanales.com/article-12145450-6.html#comment20483979</guid>
                                            </item>
      <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Commentaire de Luc]]></title>
        <link>http://www.rouesartisanales.com/article-12145450-6.html#comment20482490</link>        <description><![CDATA[Je pr&eacute;f&egrave;re de loin cette fourche-ci !!<br />...Question de go&ucirc;t...]]></description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 13:24:20 +0200</pubDate>        <guid >http://www.rouesartisanales.com/article-12145450-6.html#comment20482490</guid>
                                            </item>
  
 </channel>
</rss>